Last night
The Daily Show and
The Colbert Report teamed up for a live election night special:
Indecision 2008: America's Choice (see it
here on Hulu).
However, at the beginning Stephen Colbert thought "America's Choice" was too weak, and came up with his own title for it:
in your blog... it's "by whomever." Just thought an obvious wordsmith like you would want to have it correct.
ReplyDeletea solid 8.
ReplyDeletejenji
Also, they kept saying "an historic". In American English it is "a historic". In British pronunciation, the "h" is more silent so they say "an historic".
ReplyDeleteI understand John Oliver is a cool guy, but really, his English should not be rubbing off on Jon or Stephen. :)
First, "judgement" has become acceptable simply through excessive repetition. It has nothing to do with British or American English. Either form is equally acceptable in either country, and no one but newspaper editors concerned with print space has cared for at least fifty years, if not longer.
ReplyDeleteSecond, "an historic" is also correct regardless of country. If you're pronouncing a hard H in that word, you're simply saying it wrong regardless of what country you live in. It has nothing to do with dialect. Even in Charleston, SC, one of the deepest of the Deep South states, sites are referred to as "an historic site," as in, "The USS Yorktown is an historic site."
You don't notice errors involuntarily; you just notice bullshit you think are errors because you don't know half of what you think you do. And seriously, the only people worse than grammar nazis like myself are people who play grammar nazis on the internet.
deer Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteu r to kute. u kan haz cheezeburger plz?
kthanxbai
xoxo.
Thanks for all the comments. For the interested:
ReplyDeleteAnonymous #1: You flatter me with "wordsmith" (I can only aspire to deserve that moniker). Please see the addendum I've just added to the original post.
Jenji: I just realized I didn't mention which end of the scale indicated the bigger asshole-ness. But thanks either way.
Anonymous #2: I think Jon was saying "a" and Stephen ostensibly correcting him with "an" so that may have been a bit, not necessarily the influence of Mr. Oliver. However, I must admit I have come to prefer "an historic" (and found a site that noted we tend to still say "a history," which I realized I have done; funny how the pronunciation switches between noun and adjective). But you noted what distracted you, and thus you followed the actual thesis of the post. That is appreciated.
Anonymous #3: Keep carrying the flag for the (ahem) "grammar nazis." That will be quite the battle. You have my sympathy (sincerely), as you clearly have it much, much worse than I do. Not that I would ever consider myself worthy of inclusion in such a group, nor would I ever pretend to be representing such a group.
Not only are my language skills not keen enough, but as a general rule I avoid groups with "Nazi" in the name. (Speaking of that, I have to admit that I'd consider actual Nazis to be worse than either of the sort of people you cite. But hey, that's just me.)
And you imply you know what's going on in my mind. Is that something in which one can get certification? If so, I should sign up for that; clearly I need it. Any info you can provide about that would be appreciated.
hb: 143.
Remember, everyone: I have a picture of a corn dog in my title area. That should tell you something about the general tone of these posts.
Please feel free to point out any dumb typos you may find on my blog. I also notice stuff like "it's" being used as a possessive form and "judgement" being passed off as proper Americanish (as opposed to English).
ReplyDeleteRay